![]() ‘All I know, is that my kids and those of many, many Black and Brown students will be legacies…I wonder what the justice system will say about legacy-based admissions.’ “Being Black wasn’t enough to get me or anyone else into a school like Yale.”ĭiversity, Leleda argues, is integral to an Ivy League environment. ![]() “So it seems that placing favor on all those things are OK, but when it comes to simply considering race, that’s too much of a launching pad,” Leleda continues. ![]() In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the Court’s decision suggests that “a person’s skin color may play a role in assessing individualized suspicion, but it cannot play a role in assessing that person’s individualized contributions to a diverse learning environment.” The race-conscious admissions processes that the Supreme Court struck down have long been used to increase the inclusion of underrepresented minority students on campuses in America.Ĭhief Justice John Roberts, in the majority opinion, stated that a student “must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual not on the basis of race” and that, for too long, universities have “concluded, wrongly, that the touchstone of an individual’s identity is not challenges bested, skills built or lessons learned but the color of their skin.” By having access to any of that, you are more likely, and oftentimes, more successful at being admitted to a college.” prep tutors, feeder schools, legacies, connections. “We often hear it being used in relation to race, but there are many other ways that we favor individuals in the college admissions process. “The premise of affirmative action lies in placing favor on certain individuals or certain groups,” she says. Cant imagine the level of uncertainty current high schoolers must be feeling, if you hv questions my dms are always open #affirmativeaction ♬ original sound – leleda
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |